I more than understand. I also understand that Avery thinks we are fool's/ and he can win without learning a thing, he is a work in progress.:D
I guess I had my mind on Pl early die state coins maybe left over proof dies, and business strike satiny looking surfaces, and how differently...
Nope just set in his ways. I can appreciate that.
Heres a funky one![ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The inner tail feathers above the branch and arrows also looks weak. Mine was an ANACS 62 yellow label.
Looks good for an 86'[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No sorry's, Avery has a trust problem, even though everyone who has posted wouldn't never lead him astray.
The reverse is a quadriga, it is a copy of an ancient and really not very good. Can you see all the casting bubbles on the obv? The tooling at the...
I was already typing.
Avery, haven't we had this talk before of what you think you see and fail to learn? Your coin is to circulated and damaged to make a diagnosis....
That's a dryer coin!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Still spotty but full of luster.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Same here Green,:shame:
These early zinc's can be hard to grade, my determining factor is luster, followed by the spots, most of them are riddled, especially the low relief.
Time to find a new Bag. you have been at this for a while, and have taken notice of your persistence. Fweh good run! There are a few in those...
What about the issues with satin obverses VS polished surfaces?
I'd like to think I accentuated the luster this one is unbelievable, and yes I hate the spots, I think I rolled the coin for later.
This coin is not a candidate for attributing a variety.
Separate names with a comma.
