Here are your pictures of the 1909-S.
No. I "found", i.e. saw. I did not buy any of the slabs. They were way overpriced. The only thing I bought was a 09-S raw. I think (hope?) it...
Not sure what "others" you are referring to. However, I forgot to mention they also liked my 1919-D & S. Both 63 RD they thought.
I spent this past weekend in Fort Worth - mostly to see the grand kids and my daughter. They also had 2 50 table coins shows there going at the...
1923-S and 1925-
1919- and 1919-
Here you go Jack. 1913-D and 1916-.
Are you saying that you do not know if you were outbid? I hope that is still easy to figure out.
Here is my favorite. I will post some more later.
Did anyone else catch Jack's mistake? Hint: Look at the shipping - both of them.
By ANA standards, you are probably correct, but those are the first 3 coin I found on Heritage. They were not selected for any purpose save that...
Yes. And here are 2 more. Which would you prefer?
Not trying to make excuses for the lister, but if you look further down, you will see a 1958 Lincoln with a wheat back pictured. It appears to me...
There was a 1959 Lincoln with a wheat back reported, but I believe it was eventually found to be a fake. That being said, if you read the...
Grey Sheet lists the 09-S @ $200 in XF and $230 in AU. My guess is that is not accurte, but shoyuld indicate that there is little difference in...
I guess that I am blind. I do not see it. Here is a 09-S PCGS graded as 40. If these 2 coins are not in a different league than I am ............
On the modern coins, aside from the fact that they now know how to mix alloys, they are coated with pure copper. It is not an alloy. It sounds...
No. In fact it is probably a little of the opposite.
The alloy was not properly mixed. It is not uncommon for Lincolns through at least the mid 20's.
That 17- did not meet the reserve. It was bid to $10,200. Just guessing that the reserve was up around $14,000 - maybe more. Jack - Are you...
Separate names with a comma.
