Your are obviously trying to make a point with the seller. If you do as you describe, the seller will be absolutely none the wiser.
Wouldn't surprise me if shiny equals luster.
How does this look, Ruben? I turned down you intensity. Now that I can see the coin, I am going to guess it is a 64/65 and would probably be...
That is not one of your best pics (at least on my monitor), but that looks XF40 maybe 45 to me.
Sorry, I got it backwards. It is now corrected.
FWIW, here are the total number of coins graded by NGC and PCGS as better than 64. Granted, that is not proof of the strikes, but it should point...
27-S's may not be the sharpest tack in the box, but I have not seen many poorly struck. Some (plural) of the weakest struck coins I have seen are...
Look! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=190263041668&ssPageName=STRK:MEBI:IT&ih=009
After my previous post, I am rather hung with my selection. BTW, my second pick is probably a toss up between the 26-S and 23-S Phoenix, I don't...
I don't think our differences have nothing to do with the amount of wear, but rather the luster that everyone else is seeing. If you are saying...
Here is what my mailperson brought me today. Opinions please. Lint and scratches are on the slab, not the coin.
Separate names with a comma.
