This thread just goes to demonstrate the old saying "A fool and his money are soon parted".
I would not in the least worry about the "counterfeit beliefs or theories" being expounded by someone who believe what SGS is trying to tell him.
Here;...
This thread needs to get going again, so here are a couple of my new ones.
I am not just sure who you are "show and tell"ing to, but to most, I would think that size is an important aspect of the coin. If you tack that...
How about the 1982?
Presented in what for what?
The key is the level of the 7. If it is level with the rest of the date, then it is a small date. There are several other criteria. See;...
ABSOLUTELY - look at the prices for die #2
I do not know that they were so prone to becoming grease filled. It only happened once (supposedly) for each pair. And then think about it a...
Each is graded separate and distinct from each other because each have somewhat different details. i.e., there are 4 sets of standards to grade...
Courtesy of lincolncentresource.com. they have a good article on the 1922 no "D" cents. http://lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html
Yes, there are some descent struck 1922-D's out there. Just look at Arizonajack's avatar or my pics below. Well struck 22-D's are hard to find,...
Actually, if it were well struck, it would be a counterfeit. Since there are only 4 die pairs recognized, all have the same detail or lack thereof.
My understanding for THAT coin is that they are grading it based on the wear - not based on the details left. Many no "D"'s weak reverse have no...
I have actually seen it stated that this date should be graded "based on the reverse" - because the obverse die was so messed up. Of course, I...
To replace the one on this page; http://apachecoin.com/
Next try;
How about this?
Do not know what it means, but here is his pic blown up.
Separate names with a comma.
