It's not doubled, It is MD. Flat and shelf like. Notice how the ear is smaller and not bigger?
No you didn't.
I believe that @physics-fan3.14 collects these. Nice looking PL.
Damaged large date.
Both are MS66. The first got a + for semi PL. The second got the CAC.
That's a large date. I don't have a photo of one but someone will be along shortly to give a photo of the small date.
Apologize to those that you were rude to and I would be glad to help.
Randy he wasn't slighted. He demanded that someone give him an answer. He was told that someone can't compare a 70 S to a 70 D. Then proceeded to...
Do you think that ordering anyone to give you an answer is being polite? Take your question somewhere else, or figure it out on your own. And yes...
Plenty of hairlines and contact marks. AU55
Proof coins are struck twice to ensure details and quality. Your cent looks normal.
I am thinking I should have said 65. I went MS66 no FS. Those two marks to the right of the MM are bothering me. Otherwise I think it is a clean Jeff.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Your not right. The websites are just fine and accurate. Let me say this again. YOUR 72D's DO NOT MATCH ANY OF THE LISTED RPM's. The positioning...
Coneca and Variety Vista are the same. There are zero photos of RPM#3 on Ken Potters web site. And you are trying to use a you tube channel to...
MS63DMPL [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Album letter transfer [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Huh, 4 web sites, PCGS doesn't recognize any rpm's for 72D, Wexler doesn't either? So how did you find the variety on their site and photos? If...
Thats a good looking bust you got there, honest grade and all.
And post it to this thread.
These cents need to grade a MS67 in order to be profitable. If some of them are gradable then have at it. A processed cent is not worth the trouble.
Separate names with a comma.
