Sorry, but they moved them in 1968 to just above the date.
Far be it for me to disagree with the experts, but I see too much wear for AU and too weak a strike for VF. That leaves XF-45.
Those pictures are too small to tell for sure, but from what I can make out, I see nothing to say it is fake.
From what I can make out of your pictures, it is about XF, but the pictures are not clear enough to make out for sure. Having said that, since...
But banks do NOT generally handle foreign coins.
I can't say I have ever seen one struck on rusty dies. As for the weak strike (stike?), I think that is the picture. The fat lettering makes no...
What is the resolution of this one?
AAH!! The prodigal reappears. The "S" looks like it is #2 and I see nothing specific to point to it being a fake. Still, something just does...
If you dare, why don't you try Jerry. If he is conversant, you might get an answer from him.
Sorry, but I did not. It took a while for me to think of the letter , but I finally did.
Your 1809 is still listed there, Eduard.
If I am reading that correctly, the room is doing fine at 40%, but the safe is 49-50% (with the dehumidifiers fully charged). Dehumidifiers -...
That link I gave you was posted in 08-11-2005, 07:46 AM - 4 years ago. This site has not changed ever since. I have no idea how different...
Your pictures are about 1/2 out of focus, so, it is kind of hard to tell for sure, but that sure looks like a cast copy to me. I have no idea...
If you are talking about the area I have circled in red, that is not where the tail should appear. It is supposed to be where I have the green arrow.
I liked the last one better! This one - 65/66 RB?
I think I am missing something here. 1910???
Someday, I am going to get me one of them!! Also the only one I am missing.
I hope. I thought that maybe an example might convince some of them.
Just FYI, here are two renditions of the same picture. The first original is 1500X720 px and 350 KB. The second original is 1000X480 and 170KB....
Separate names with a comma.
