Besides the dings/bag marks on the the eagles wing. Which are very minor. The photo makes them look worse than they are. There is a very faint...
It was probably removed from a proof set. does it show cladding on the third side? If not it is a silver proof.
Completely forgot about this one, 1809[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Cool face, I mean obverse, shield.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A different look at the obverse. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here is another look at it. Might just throw it in the stash of mint sets. It's a blazing coin. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Never mind the color it is blast...
That tail is a die marker, has nothing to do with the grade. Good eyes.:peeking:
Just a flash of the luster in pastel green, my photos are trying to hide some details.
You have half the story.
They are a little off on color GTG. ANACS slab. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] It's hard to find. There is a reason for this grade.
Great tones on that one Skyman. 5.7. MS66?
The line swipes by the mint mark. A mid die stage, but has serious die deterioration. That in hand looks like a retained cud in an early die state
Are you trying to incite a conversation about unretained strikethru's of a reeded collar'?
Way better than the 37'D I saw a few weeks ago, didn't have the peeing obstruction between the legs, nor did it have the abraded leg. I hope that...
Amazing that I live here and can't hardly find one in Circ. With the travel that we have had the past year and 3/4. Maybe there are more hoarders...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Lov'in some five cents. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
