1955 - MS-64 1986 - xxxx 2006 - MS-69 1972S - PF-67 UC
The thread was started last year and the coin is a raw coin.
Here is one that I still like. I just wish it had not been cleaned first.
That has got to be die clash marks. I overlaid the obverse on the reverse. The marks you point out align perfectly with the chin. I also found...
On that point you are 111% correct!
Sorry, snaz. The coin is in a F-12 slab. See here. It is also listed other places in this thread.
see http://www.cointalk.com/t104164/
A quote from my first post; I have always though it a fake. I just cannot seem to find the niche it fits in.
Your thread of hope is not strong enough to hang a spider from. That coins is a fake. All I am saying is that the location of a mintmark against...
You are assuming that there is only 1 die pair used for this date. There were 4 used for the S VDB with 484K coins. There were at least that...
I cannot decide between a 10 and a 12. Since someone already guessed 12, I will take a 10.
No, I did not "cheat", per se. I often use Heritage as a comparator for any coin I am not familiar with and sometimes just as a reference. As I...
Did you line up the verticals? BTW, I went back and tried it again after enlarging the date a bit. I suspect what I said before is correct,...
Raider forgot to mention that you have to be a member to access all the info. Join! It is free and you really do get a bunch of info. Plus,...
The only place I would seriously trust is Heritage. You actually get to see what the coins really sold for.
Yep. One has nailed it.
1934- g-6 1855- xf-45 1840-o vf-30 1921- ms-62
I also suspect that the coin is funny, but I tried to copy the right "4" over the "1". Problem is, it does not fit there. I know it is possible...
Are you sure you are using the same order as the others? The corrosion I see is on #3.
Hopefully. At least now I know what I can bid.
Separate names with a comma.
