No, it's a 1961 Lincoln... And this is a 1961 Lincoln [IMG]
Hi, do you collect coins?
Actually Chris, I think you would help someone unless they want to rub your nose in it. I'm not being critical.
My Gallienus coins are too worn for me to tell.
@Long Beard to be a nitpick, is it too late to change the to in the title to too?
A defect in the plating or broken plating bubble can allow the underlying zinc to rot. That's what I think it is. Wait for others.
Like this? :) [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Another consideration that occurs to me, mentioned ad nauseum on modern coins is a filled die. If grease or dirt got on one part of the die being...
I was directing that to you and Doug. One listing I saw had him born May 14, 1928, but other sources have June 14...my bad. My birthday, July 12...
I think that is the "zinc rot" variety.
Good question, I would like to know too.
AU55
Considering the manner in which "ancient" coins were struck, a weak strike should also be considered.
Google is your friend [ATTACH]
[IMG] Happy Birthday...did you know we share our special day?
OK, makes sense
Thinking about what @Bruce DiLego said, what would keep me from melting the 95% Lincolns into 1 kilo bars? Why IS it illegal?
I think that it is a magician's coin, dime on one side and penny on other. Worth a couple of dollars to someone who wants it.
Honestly to me, they don't even look close, perhaps @Lehigh96 could comment.
Hey, it's all very simple, just expand the existing 70 point scale to include decimals and we can argue if a coin is MS60.1 or MS60.2 :)...
Separate names with a comma.
