Sure they do. However, this one will not get a star - it shows no cameo contrast, and the eye appeal is only average at best.
I was gonna say 64. The reverse looks pretty nice, but the obverse is so beat up that it brings the grade down. If I were to split grade this, I'd...
Yeah, this one looks like it could be a DDR. It is pretty minor, and I'm guessing nobody collects them so it doesn't add value, but its minorly...
Gonna call that one a 53, I think. It looks very nice.
Well, yet again you are wrong. First - Bugs Bunny Franklins are business strikes, not proofs. Second, the *original* cameo effect on a die of...
In 2011, he auctioned his private collection of halves through Stacks. That's where I got this one. It is graded 64PL.
The first picture is pretty good. The second picture is just garish and cartoon-like. It looks overprocessed - frankly, if I see a picture like...
No, I like it as a 65. It doesn't have the "flash" and "pop" I'd expect for a 66.
No wear is immediately apparent in those pictures. But it is very difficult to determine AU from UNC just based on pictures, most of the time.
I don't see anything wrong with that coin. I don't do a whole lot with copper, so I cannot comment on the color - but the rim looks just fine.
No, you don't need an endoscopic microscope. If you can't clearly see it with a 10x loupe, it's not worth finding.
Separate names with a comma.
