[IMG] [IMG]
I really wonder how that 58D at the top really looks in hand. The pictures look... optimistic.
That is such a minor variety, hardly even noticeable. I am flabbergasted at the astronomic sums people pay for it.
While it may technically be a 67, market grading is going to knock a point or two off that. First, you'll never get anywhere near the price guide...
AU-53
AU-58
When your pictures are as inconsistent (and generally not very good) as yours, a GTG like this is more a matter of luck than skill. It is not...
64
The obverse looks very unattractive. It has an appearance consistent with artificial toning which has turned, or gone bad. I don't know what the...
It is on the mintmark, then it is an RPM (repunched mintmark) - not a DDR (double die reverse). The die is hubbed before the mintmark is punched,...
I've funneled the money I've earned from my book back into my hobby. I earned enough from sales of the book to pay for my trip to FUN last month....
Dang. Yet another gorgeous group. You have an amazing collection.
It looks UNC, but it looks a bit dinged up and sneezed on. It's pretty much worth its silver value, not much premium.
I agree. As to PL 20-centers - they do exist. Maybe not as common as the quarter, but they are around.
That would definitely be true, if PCGS gave stars ;)
I'd guess: 63 64 65 65 It is impossible to judge the bell lines from those pictures.
Looking at the Heritage auction prices realized - 1896 graded 65 in blast white are selling for around $140-$160. Both of the ones you posted have...
Some are, some aren't. Most aren't worth the ridiculous prices some pay, but many are worth a small bit more.
It's not listed because its not an RPM. It is very clearly MD.
That is not a proof. It may be a nice prooflike, however. Proofs wouldn't have a die clash like that - and if they did, all of the research and...
Separate names with a comma.
