I did open 1 of them. Haven't looked thru them all yet.
The imperfection is distracting and hurts the value IMO. There is a very small number of collectors that might be interested in a strike thru, and...
Nothing spectacular so far. Yeah, it is the thought of finding a full step 64 that still makes em interesting.
What does the third side look like?
First roll is 64D All look UNC. 2 steps visible on the first coin. Think I am going to take these upstairs for a look in better lighting.
I am always on the hunt. If only my pocket book was bigger.
That's the way, I have been leaning. There were two other rolls in tubes one was 54's, might have found a couple 54 Hennings.
Since the MM was hand punched, I really don't consider many of these Variety's or errors. The ones I do consider errors are the ones that become...
What ever it is. It's a keeper with that circam look.
I found a few old Fed rolls. $4 dollars a roll Open em? The enders are nicely toned. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Lets take this photo. [IMG] You will notice that the doubling happens on all sides of the letters. The details of the devices aren't strong, they...
Nice looking Frankie, Furham. 48 was the first year of production so the majority were well struck and had FBL. I am anywhere between 58 and 64....
I didn't either, I know that when I find these raw. They are rarely struck hard enough to remove the planchet marks. So, finding examples that...
Thats a nice looking Booker T. Never realized there were 18 in the set. I have 2. A 51P and a 46D. Edit I didn't notice the link.
I wonder if thats even possible. But what a beautiful site it would be to see them all together.
The ear and horn look complete. So, the tail must be just strike. This all comes down to the luster. I am at 65, if the luster is all there. But...
I completely agree.
Is this one that you sent to get graded?
So hard to tell what kind of luster is on the coin. And because of that I can't tell what is a weak strike or wear. I want to say 63, but I think...
Separate names with a comma.
