I am pretty sure anything you see is a combination of lighting effects, Longacre doubling, and just a touch of machine doubling. I did not see any...
AU details, wiped.
I would call this coin VF details (probably VF-30). The surfaces of this coin appear unattractive, and lead me to think their are hidden problems...
There are several theories as to why the New Orleans Morgans are weakly struck from certain years (this affected the later years more than the...
Soft strike, dull luster, and ugly spots bring this to a 62 for me.
I grade it "Silver"
That coin does not appear to be a slider, in my opinion. To me, a slider hides the wear well enough that it could pass for UNC (it is a high end...
No, there is no consensus. As with all slabs, but the coin, not the label. Some are undergraded, some are overgraded. The coin in the OP has...
Nice coin! I was torn between 64+ and 65. As nice as the coin is, however, those pictures are even better. Except for being slightly out of...
I only own one, for type. NGC MS-67* PL CAC [IMG] [IMG]
It is attractive, sure - but I also think it is accurately graded. Just because it is in an old holder doesn't mean that it is undergraded....
You absolutely can find good coins in any holder. For some holders, it takes a little more time, knowledge, and searching - but when you know what...
Lotta luster on that shiny silver. Nice!
This is a nice coin!
NGC has basically uploaded the Krause catalogs to their site. You'll notice that the pictures, information, numbering, and valuation is all based...
Perhaps I'm not seeing it from your pictures, but why did PCGS call this questionable color? I would not have questioned this, from your pics.
What is questionable about the color in the OP? I don't see anything wrong with it? It appears like it may have been dipped recently, but that...
It is attractive, but fairly standard roll type toning. There is no premium for this toning on this coin.
Separate names with a comma.
