Thanks for replying otherwise I would have forgot to post the close up of the date. I definitely need to take some better photos. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Those are not cuds Willie.
6 FS are not known on the 62 Philly. It has to be a proof.
Here is a little closer look at the date. This one is a Snow-2. Repunched 902 and a misplaced 0 in the reeding. The clash is very faint....
They are carbon spots. My overexposed obv photo makes them much darker and prominent than they are.
UNC details PL.
Not today. Heavily deteriorated dies Willy.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Sure, as heck doesn't look 64 to me.
DC [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Personally, I don't think that they were all that tough on it. They definitely used everybit of the ANA grading standards on this one. I have...
MS66
I am guessing that ANACS called it a 62.
Nice DDR. I will have my eye out for one now.
Only 1 had the grade right, and then he changed his grade. The light circ marks have to be looked for on this one. She is well struck and has a...
NO, but the market has.
[ATTACH]
Oh, yeah not sure the year but most after 95' are NiFC.
Part of that is participating in other threads, you may not think they have any way in partaining to your education, but they do.
Ya too many photo's but carry on. Looks like a fun box, Check them for RPD's and RPM's. An honest grade is what you keep.
Separate names with a comma.
