I'll guess AU but the image makes it tough to tell much about the luster. I'm thinking it may have a few too many dips.
63 or 64. The obverse looks AU but I don't think it really is. I like the coin.
VF details, cleaned.
Copper cents get this more than most other types of coins. When TPGs see a look that's not normal, they question it. They are not saying it's AT...
Can't tell what it is from the image. I'm sure it's not the big one.
Nice coin. I could see it in a 67 holder.
Any good dealer will take back a fake and refund the price of the coin. Grading fees are in the air. Too many things involved.
I'm not sure it would grade. The obverse looks like it was worked on to me. Edit to add. My post is about the OP coin.
These two should be fun.:cool:
I'm wrong. If Broadstruck says they are real, I'm sure he is correct.
You need to find a new expert. There is no way those are a hundred and something years old.
I agree.
The 55 looks to have breaks in the luster across Franklins face and across the bell lines. I net graded the 37 and just called them both VF. The...
EF on the cent. AU on the 55 half. MS60 on the 58D half. VF on both buffalos.
Fun to play with.
Lots of folks collect these. I would look for nice sets. Don't buy any with ugly coins in them.
I can't see putting any money into the coins. To me it would be a waste. I could see it if the coins had some special meaning.
Coins such as this should not be dipped. You can't help the value. The OP coin had more than a dip. I'll guess someone took a brush after it....
I'm not very good with these but I have to ask. Are you sure they are real? They just seem to match too well.
EF details, cleaned.
Separate names with a comma.
