Back on track. [IMG] [IMG]
64rb.
[IMG] [IMG]
PCGS gave this one AU Details cleaned and I agree. [IMG] [IMG]
I have 2 or 3 that are missing and 2 or 3 that I don't know where they came from.
This is from a 1952 copy. Mark Feld is related to him in some way. [IMG]
What you are seeing is called Longacre doubling. It's very common and brings no extra value. It's under $100
[IMG]
[IMG] Anyone know who made this image?
I would call it AU details, cleaned, damaged.
That reverse strike sure fooled me. I thought the OP might have mixed up his images. The lighting probably took away some of the detail.
The scratches on the face are on the coin. The rest are on the holder. I can make them all go away in a different image.;)
Just some thoughts. Your system may have more than one type of USB port. Have you tried having the camera plugged in before you boot the system?...
You might try this. Click on start and type "program compatibility" in the search bar. This may help you find a way to run a 32 bit program.
This one got a 64. [IMG]
For the first time in my 57 years, there was not a big family party at mom's house. Looks like it's my turn to take over from now on. I can't...
My first thought was proof but the reverse image changed my mind. I'm at AU or 63 PL if not a details grade.
Not just an opinion. It's a fact. Rubbing a coin with anything is a really bad idea.
This will kill any value the coin may have.
Separate names with a comma.
