The rim dings are much worse in the photos than in hand. I imagine the TPG's could take issue and give it a mid or low AU grade. By the way this...
Not sure the tape had PVC in it but I could be wrong. I know that they make a PVC tape that sticks well to PVC plumbing etc. I haven't done a soak...
All the die markers were there to identify this one. the die crack from the wheat to the rim, the die crack from E in One. there are multiple...
Could be an occluded gas bubble, A lot of these are done with heat though. Most aren't errors.
Save a few rolls I know that a few of us would buy them from you.
I read that one the other day. Glad they got caught!
That is just a lighting artifact, no rim ding.
i remember three times face. That 42 is a solid coin XF @potteryplease
Just wondering 50 years later ....
Unless they were mint state a variety or an error. most have kept there value.
It's a short cross. Cool find! [IMG] [IMG]
Just wondering what you think it's raw. [ATTACH]
It does! those Marks I chose to highlight, nah every time I got back into focus they showed up. A hint, MM position.
Like I said the Luster is really amazing on this one. Thanks
Look up the 60 D small date Vs large date, you will have your answer.
The luster is much deeper red than what it shows, There is a variety. [ATTACH]
It took me a minute to realize that this coin was struck in coin alignment. That is a neat clash! And beautiful coin!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The dealer said he pulled it from an album or folder and the coin was held in for years by tape.
A split in toning I imagine could happen on a roll half folded. Maybe I have been looking at the coin all wrong.
Separate names with a comma.
