Thanks! I think it could be a 65 too. It's not likely to ever visit a TPG while I have it. This is my earliest Lincoln proof. [ATTACH]
I like the way all the proof 1882 nickels have the same shiny spot beneath the date and the same clutter in the numerals. The MS example has a...
New photos. This is very shiny and reflective in hand, and very splashy with reds, greens, violets, and blues. It's raw, so I can't satisfy...
While nowhere near as spectacular as @robec's matte proof, here is a new photo of my business strike 1913. [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I really like that 39-S. [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
Rephotographed with my new camera and moveable light. [ATTACH]
This may not be as shiny as some of my other Buffaloes, but it marks the completion of a Buffalo year set for me, with a duplicate or two and a...
If this isn’t about enjoying what you do, then what’s the point, after all? I like that there’s room for all kinds of approaches and that they can...
Sorry for the delay responding, but I was waiting for my new camera before answering. So, no, I don't think it is a DDR 001. Here is a picture of...
I now have a new setup, courtesy of Ray (@rmpsrpms ) over at www.macrocoins.com. This is a variation of his system #1, with a special...
47.61 shipped. Not sure why I bid on this one, because I just got another 1925 two weeks ago (in post #21564). Seems like a brain cramp on my...
If you are going to sell this as "1930 Buffalo Nickel Nice Circulated Condition", then you really can't expect someone to pay more than $2.85 for...
This brings up a point I have been thinking about recently, too. A friend asked be to look at sets of Lincolns, Buffalo nickels, and Mercury dimes...
For reference... The angle of lighting can affect which elements of the design are more prominent. [ATTACH]
It's impossible to say which of these is "newest". They both arrived in today's mail. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] The second one was an educated eBay...
Separate names with a comma.
