I am following my under-$20 purchase with an under-$5 purchase. I noticed that my 1960 nickel not only has noticeable machine doubling, which I...
So here’s a proof for comparison. (Yes, that’s an eyelash on the front.) [ATTACH]
This 1940 Mercury is actually an under-$20 purchase. [ATTACH]
I’m so close, I might as well finish off the decade of San Francisco cents. [ATTACH]
My favorite is whatever I looked at last. But this is one I am glad I am able to have. [ATTACH]
Here’s another S mint for comparison. Notice how the surface is shiny, but not glossy like the reprocessed / replated ones. I always thought the...
And a new photo for this 1911-S, last shown in Guess the Grade 1911-S Lincoln. [ATTACH]
A new photo of this 1912-S, last shown in post #4218. [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
Just rephotographed this one, last shown in post #4255. [ATTACH]
I like this one from San Francisco, too. [ATTACH]
I understand what you are saying, but this approach seems intriguing as a way to extend the numismatic experience. I am also wondering if there...
How can that be only MS 61? What horrible thing am I missing? It looks much better to me. Edit: And maybe I should be scouring all the low MS and...
Hmmm, shouldn’t you also talk to the TPG’s about embedding this technology into each slab? Or is the barcode and certificate validation apps...
New photographs of this 1917-S, as I continue to work my way towards the beginning of the series. [ATTACH]
I like the way that these nickels, although only 15 years old, have picked up enough toning to be noticeable. Although not as strongly toned as...
52
Separate names with a comma.
