[ATTACH]
I don’t know if anyone can tell more from this, but I cropped and straightened from the original photo. Remember that this 1877 is also marked as...
I counted 20 coins that are marked as proofs, including this one. [ATTACH] @canudigit, when you get more pictures, please use the "Full Image"...
I feel somewhat contrarian here, but in your very nice pictures I see no doubling, much less tripling. All I see is a reflection of the lighting...
This 1911 came in the same package as the 1909 I just posted. [ATTACH]
I swished the coin around in distilled water, and there was no change that I could see. Then I used some acetone, then distilled water, and then...
I have to also post this proof to show how the 1882 shield nickel proofs both have the same shiny mark under the first 8 in the date. They have...
I love the Tombac nickel. Here’s another one. I bought it for the reverse, so the fingerprint is not that much of an issue to me. [ATTACH]
This just arrived. I think I’ll give it a swish in some distilled water, acetone, and then xylene to see if it removes the slightly dirty look in...
This was one of my first photos, by the looks of it. Maybe I should take it over. [ATTACH] Edit: I did just take it over. I kept it a little...
I got this 1855 1/2 Cent today [ATTACH] to go along with my 1855 Large Cent. [ATTACH] Here are the full photos. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I also have, like, five of these. Some have problems, some are closer to what I hoped. I just have a thing for these early dates. [ATTACH]...
These seem very similar in that they seem almost tan, rather than red or brown. [ATTACH]
As I look more at the high resolution photos, I see more chatter and less sharpness, so I am tending towards the same conclusion. Also, there’s a...
The 1880's are getting closer to complete. With the arrival of this 1888 IHC, I only have 1880 and the two 1886 varieties to go. I sorta made a...
Separate names with a comma.
