Well, I'd be at AU-50 to 53 but I don't see any luster. So, I'll say AU-50.
Here's three[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] . Unlike @johnmilton, I'll never have a 1796-7 no matter the condition.
I'd call the Buff F-12 and the $1 XF-45.
I went back and re-attributed this coin and confirmed that both sides match all the attributes of the S-65. Additionally, I took photos of the...
@KBBPLL, that seems the most likely reason for their determination. But I find it difficult to believe that this coin is so damaged they can't...
This post is partly a vent and mostly a request for help in understanding. I just got back a submission from one of the two top TPGs and this...
That is true. Due to the typical weak reverse strike, any wear there makes the coin looks more worn that it really is. But there is clearly a...
Agree. I think this is a solid attribution. I have the O-116 as a R-4 and the O-129 as a R-5. This from the Fifth Edition of Parsley.
45
Yes, on occasion. Personal transactions. The club also has an auction at each meeting. We also have members who are either part-time or...
The coin was previously in a PCGS holder graded MS-66+. I saw it in that holder earlier this year. So it crossed at the same grade. No, I did...
Separate names with a comma.
