I went with 66 because of a few things. I figured it had even better luster than what the first images were showing. The slab shot shows that...
AU
66
If they were that tough on prints they would also have to detail every coin with a spot.
Did you read the form you signed when you sent the coin to PCGS? You should read it. What is lawfully graded?
It's a modern medal. The museum is in Richmond....
The guy is ticked because his coin came back details. What a terrible thing.
There are too many coins out there with prints to call them all details.
You seem to be the only one that does not understand the meaning of the word "questionable". It's not a grade. It means they question the color....
I don't know. The marks look really deep.
You don't know what you are talking about. I question if you have ever been a dealer. You don't talk or act like any dealer I have ever known. You...
It took a hit.
MD
Fine
He did give it a good effort. His book came out in 1984. He put some bucks into having it published. An image just for fun. [ATTACH]
Same here.
I'm going to trust NGC did not print the coins. It's possible but I don't think so. Prints can take time to show. Once they do, it's a gamble if...
I think it's just the image that's giving it the details look. Either way the grading cost are as much as the value of the coin.
VF-35
If I had to guess from the images shown, I would have said 67 or 68. I would not have guessed 69 from the images. I don't know if PCGS is right or...
Separate names with a comma.
