And just how did you show these images to all these grading services?
Some of these images look to be scans from some book. None of the images posted to this point can be compared. I'm starting to think the OP is...
Those are not tool marks. You need to take a step back and understand how wrong you are on this entire issue.
You need to post images that show all of the coin. I believe ANACS sent you the same coins you sent them.
At one time, I was up to about 24 feet and a dozen large boxes, maybe more. Now I'm down to about 8 feet and a couple of dozen boxes in storage....
I don't believe ANACS would switch a coin. Why would they? Your images are too poor to show anything. Sorry but that's just the truth.
Worn die but the images are adding a lot of distortion.
I'm at AU something.
64
None of the coins you posted are proofs. Give it time and you will be able to spot the difference.
Just for fun. What's wrong with this one? ;) [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
I may be wrong but I believe the FS-019 is a cross reference to the old CPG numbering system. I don't have a clue about the value but it's pretty...
Nice old coin.
Happy Birthday. You should take the day off and go hunting. Or just go to the bar.:D
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This was all done after the coins left the mint. The mint does not do any test that would explain the OP coin.
It was probably used to measure the degree of rake on saw blades.
With a bit more luster it would be 66. Pretty coin.
Nice coin. You probably know this but, don't clean it in any way.
Separate names with a comma.
