I think it should but they said no. I'll pass it around next year at Fun and see what folks think.
I think that most of the ones I have posted were dipped at some point.
Yea, we could debate all of them. Opinions based on images will always bring this out.
[ATTACH]
It's really nice but the wear and the surfaces, held it back to a 53. I agree with PCGS. Wish CAC liked it but that's ok.
A little about the coin. I actually bought this coin before the show. It would have been gone if I had waited. It came from a good friend I hang...
Thanks. I got it now. I can't see that the cracks join. Looks like it should just be called a pair of cracks.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Round six. Reeded edge, PCGS. [ATTACH]
Is there a proper term for something like this. Die crack or retained cud? Are both terms correct?
Six members nailed it. okbustchaser nailed the O-122. [ATTACH]
Sure you can. That 18-S is really nice.
Lets bump this back a few years. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This is also a guess the luster thread. :D The images I'm posting don't do a great job of showing luster.
Round five. The color on this one caught my eye. NGC. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
These things are crazy to grade from images. Round five in a few.
Next coin should be any coin dated 1964 or any Kennedy half.
Here she is. [ATTACH]
Sq 2, Sm 8, Lg Let
This is a good example of a post that is tough to understand. I don't think anyone knows what you are trying to say. I still question why you risk...
Separate names with a comma.