Nice looking proof.
I guess it's time. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Fun idea. I'm thinking that production cost would go up because of a shorter die life. Maybe just do it for the mint sets but that might tick off...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Happy birthday guys.
As said. It's just a stain.
You came to the right place to learn. Check out the different forums here and enjoy the reading. Welcome to the fun at CT.
PCGS. Two images of each side. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No way to even guess the grade from those images.
That's where you broke the rules.
Either way, it's a nice looking BUGS BUNNY.
Wow. Thank you for the link to that cool old thread. Several members here posted in that thread 12 years ago. I actually remember reading it back...
Anyone know what standard ANACS used? We know that PCGS and NGC used different standards.
I looked it up. They did. @Santinidollar What is your thought? You have it in hand.
Did ANACS even put FBL on the label when this was graded?
I don't trust the ping test.
I'll guess a damaged collar.
They removed the residue and that's what you paid for. They did the conservation work. They may or may not have been able to tell if the coin had...
The obverse shows signs of cleaning but not anything that PCGS did.
I'll guess the cleaning was already there but hiding under the residue.
Separate names with a comma.
