Not when I've sold -- the PayPal fee is the PayPal fee. They did at one point have different fees depending on whether the payment came from a CC...
Well, I let it play for half an hour or so, but now I've got to take my laptop to a service appointment. :(
The "Oreo-cookie" effect in that fourth photo is always a dead giveaway for chemical damage -- the softer copper gets etched away more quickly...
AMEX restored the benefits you get, but as @masterswimmer and @messydesk pointed out, they're still more expensive for the seller. The first...
You pick the oddest things to laugh at.
I must've missed this thread the first time. Gosh, um, thanks for bringing it back up...
Nah. It's a terrible picture, and between that and the toning, it's hard to see the lower serif -- but I'm pretty sure it's there. I'm also pretty...
Well, that's a stinker, even if that isn't an S I see lurking under the date...
Back in 2017, I listed a lot of 100 40% Kennedy halves for I think $255, which was the going rate at the time -- "melt" was higher, but they trade...
I think your photos are clear enough that they'd show the doubling on ER if it were present. I don't see it. :( I also don't see the date scratch....
Yeah, but they all start out raw...
For a while that was true, but over the last year I'm seeing a lot more new BIN listings with shipping additional. It did catch my attention. I'm...
Ooh, and I've got free shipping as a result of my follies earlier in the year! Oh, fine.
Still up. I'm dithering -- I don't collect mint sets as a rule, but the low mintage makes it tempting. And I don't collect American Innovations,...
Yep, your post added good information. I'm sorry my post read as though I was responding to yours; I've edited it to be clearer (I hope).
I see what you mean, but the "pimples" or "dimples" look to me to be honest hits, as does the stuff to the left of the date. That very straight...
The coin in the original post is not the overdate. The 1942/1-D is more subtle than the Philadelphia version, but every example must have the...
I keep telling myself I'll do the same, but myself knows better.
Is everybody else convinced that the 1889-CC is authentic? It looks kind of blobby to me, especially the stars, but it doesn't have the "trailing"...
The "pimple" on the Morgan looks like something sharp was jabbed into it. Note that the metal is raised around it; whatever poked the hole pushed...
Separate names with a comma.
