You just had it checked out by multiple people, who all know how the minting process works, and what errors look like. You ignored them.
I'd check the 72's for DDOs if there are any in there.
I remember OP posting a different coin that their father had listed as Gratien also. Didn’t think it was gold though. I’m probably wrong.
Did you even look at the link I posted?
Looks more like 007.
Beautiful coin. Great looking overdate too.
It is an absolutely stunning coin. When my dad dies, all I will get is a bunch of stuff that will need to be hauled to the dump.
FTFY ;)
Hey, I knew I left that somewhere! I will PM you my address so you can send it back to me;) Congrats!
Definitely a stain and not a strike. [ATTACH]
For starters, it isn't Gratian. ;) Valentinian II AV Solidus Struck 377-380 AD Obverse: DN VALENTINIANVS IVN PF AVG, pearl-diademed, draped and...
[ATTACH]
Naw. not rewrapped by a previous hunter. I get rolls like this from Loomis every so often. I've received cents in nickel paper and halves in...
You’d be doing us and yourself a favor if you took petter pictures.
Yup. Normal. ;)
Now you are confusing me. What year is your coin? 1989 or 1988?
Yes it is the reverse of 89. You said your coin was a 1989...therefore making it the correct FG for your coin.
That is the correct FG for 1989.
Looks like there is a smaller clip at like 9 on the obverse as well. I don't see any Blakesly Effect which I would expect to see on a clip as big...
Separate names with a comma.
