I'm actually seeing what you are seeing. Besides a few minor blemishes, the coin looks virtually flawless. I might be overgrading as well, but...
This one is tough...the details all appear sharp, but I believe there is wear and the picture suggests there is virtually no luster...so high end...
BU++++++++++ :p I'll say MS 64... it's not a proof, right? Just a very nice Unc example?
It was sent to PCGS (not by me, but by a friend).
What do you all think PCGS graded this example? [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'll go with 65PL ...it appears that more chatter in the fields is accepted on prooflike coins...plus the cheek looks fairly clean on this example
See the replies above your post. In summary, the stars being too large and the Eagle's tail feathers are two main parts that many don't like.
MS 66 .. with a rarity grade bump...the cheek appears to have a scratch which is likely market acceptable
In my opinion, polls narrow down the options (make it more clear what it is) unless the poll has 10+ choices. Plus with polls, you can have the...
MS 64+ ...a few less hits on the cheek and I could see it as a 65/66
MS 64
MS 66 RD PL ...the coin appears to have that prooflike appearance of the more recent Denver issues
You're welcome @BrianS If you want, showcase your journey of filling the album. I'd love to see it! Best of luck!
1. The 1320 looks circulated to me from the photo...the high points appear to have rub or wear.. I'll go AU 55 2. The 1330 looks like the...
I'd say it's closer to 75% :p
Nice start! Keep it going!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Post a picture of both sides of the coin here (on this forum) and we'll help you.
Here is an Uncirculated example from online: [ATTACH] Here is a circulated coin (lower grade)...notice it has more hits/dings and there is no...
These two links are mostly for silver quarters, but it's a good start:...
Separate names with a comma.
