A couple of them may be nice enough that grading would be beneficial but breaking up that nice of a set would be difficult to do. I’d think about...
Very nice set of Caesar’s.
That 1952-D is a great lamination. It looks as if you could insert a small piece of paper under the error and it looks like a small piece broke...
Looks good to me as well. I think the wear patterns are correct for a genuine coin. The CC mint mark also looks like a VAM and a counterfeiter...
It’s a proof coin so leave as in. It’s a very minor error and the packaging is necessary to show it’s an error.
I’ll stick with the current scale. I’m too old to change. :)
I don’t collect commemorative coins but my 7070 album needed a few. Here’s what I have in the Dansco. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
Deal breaker friend in many things. The coin and the price, the grade since it’s in a slab, where and how big is the spot in question. You can...
I wouldn’t want mine to be replaced if I won it in the Olympics. The toning looks nice.
Definitely a magicians quarter worth a few dollars.
The 1943 is a lamination error and that’s very common in the silver war nickels.
A decent 1921, the last year of issue. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A 1902-O, common but raw and nice. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
One of the more common CC’s but still highly desirable. It’s as n 1892-CC. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
One of more recent additions, an 1893. Only 378,000 and less surviving. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nice find, a nice looking common date Indian Head Cent. It does have a rim ding.
The fifth photo is damage to the rim caused by a hit. As for everything else, I’m not seeing any errors and I have no idea what you mean by...
They are not dangerous except for any sharp edges.
Punch outs from steel electric junction boxes.
May you enjoy your time as you add to your journal and please remember to post photos. :)
Separate names with a comma.
