maybe strike through error...
altered surface
looks like a bottle cap top to me, (reverse) maybe missing clad layer on obverse...
now I know it all gone to the dogs, I would never paid the same price for a good untouched coin, compared to a clean coin, period, you can say...
mirco S on the peace, I would say theres no-way to prove the errors on the dime are from the mint, you'll die tring
heres a site, match yours up http://doubleddie.com/849597.html
I don't think I've seen so many vams for one date
[ATTACH]
au-51
the 1970-s with missing mint mark is a proof coin, not a business strike coin
both minted in phil. not suppose to have mint marks, only Denver and san francisco have them for thoses years, heres a photo of a 1969...
heres one on ebay http://www.ebay.com/itm/English-Silver-Half-Crown-2-6-half-Crown-coin-James-II-1686-gF-nVF-359-/380532146980
at one time this is what it looked like [ATTACH]
jewelry coin, not sure what its worth
it would of been a altered surface either way
This error is known as a die shift, heres some info: Description This error shows a doubling that occurs while striking. Explanations When a die...
Didn't know they were calling double queen's back, machine doubling, I know canada does their errors different then the us does, somebody told me...
Hey, thats a nice find, heres mine...
I know pcgs has a cross-over program
just remember only a story, inside jobs happen all the time
Separate names with a comma.