I have not found the composition. If anyone finds that, please share. Here are the main difference I've noticed: M19: Peacock is looking to the...
Start by examining the cost of grading vs the cost of buying the coin already graded. If it will cost you $20 for grading but you can buy the same...
This one seems to be on par with the other 1983. It also has hits, although in different areas. The luster looks to have the potential to be...
First thought: I didn’t know Aaron Rodgers was that passionate about coins. :D
This one appears (to me) to be a higher grade than the 1983. I'm not seeing major hits; there do appear to be die polish lines as well as some...
And another set of pictures to show the toning. Again a big thank you to @lordmarcovan for inspiring me to acquire this one! :) [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Since first learning of this cool token from @lordmarcovan trade thread, I have been looking for one on and off. Finally the right example came up...
I believe you can take them out and put each coin in it's own flip or just leave it in the holder. However, as many have noted, it is almost...
I don't believe PCGS ever had a label affixed to the box. NGC had the sticker over the slab. PCGS used to crack them out and put the coin into a...
I'll also say AU 55. This is a very attractive circulated example and a nice example of the type regardless of grade.
@Cascade is the big reveal happening?
First impression was MS 64, but I think it may have ended up in an MS 65 holder. If you're happy with the coin, then that is all that matters. :)
Feel free to post separate threads on the coins you want to learn more about. You should be able to get plenty of responses (including opinions on...
At $150, one might not come around soon. But if you're willing to give it some time, then one of the auction venues (like GC, Heritage, or eBay)...
So far we have @EyeAppealingCoins with NT And I'll also say that it's NT ...looks like toning from the original packaging
We can continue with this one: [IMG] [IMG]
Summary of results: ----------------------- Coin 1 - Clad Dime (pg.1) - 2 (NT/MA) vs 6 (AT/QC) Coin 2 - Franklin (pg. 1) - 3 (NT/MA) vs 7 (AT/QC)...
Maybe the seller bought the coin with that picture and just reused it, never noticing the photoshop? It would be funny if there wasn't anything...
Probably not, but it further detracts from the coin. Have you tried asking the seller what those photoshopped spots hide? :D
Is that also an "X" scratched in under the eye (by the hair) on the obverse?
Separate names with a comma.
