[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I understand completely
She’s sweet too!
A 1946-D Walker graded by PCGS as a MS-65. 2,151,000 were minted but they all don’t look like this. Lol [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
For antique photos we called them “Hand Tinted” photos. You may want to try that term to see if it improves your searching.
For that I’d go with ANACS. The error should not affect the grade but I’d pay extra to have the error listed on the label.
My 1877-S and my 1875-S. The first one is very common with 9,519,000 minted. The second one has 4,487,000 minted with this being reverse 1....
My 1878-S Trade Dollar. More common than the 1877. 4,162,000 were minted.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
My 1877 Trade Dollar. A common date with 3,039,200 minted. No chop marks on this one. :) [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
What you see is common for this date.
Only the 1939-D has the next lowest mintage and it has almost a million more than the 1950-D, which has a total mintage of 2,630,030.
In a few months. :)
But I became a member of CT before you did. :)
Thank you. This has always worked for me but I will admit, I used several common date, low grade silver coins to practice on first.
H er e is a super 1950-D Jefferson Nickel, a key date. It’s been graded as MS-65 by PCGS. In hand it’s a great looking coin. As typical, it’s does...
I’ve never seen nor heard of such but it sounds reasonable. Then again, when did coins start to get slabbed and graded? I doubt any photos were...
AU-53 and too much for the coin because of the toning.
I’d use a product called E-zest. A very quick dip, no rubbing and a complete and thorough rise under warm water. If you over dip you will lose the...
It needs to be off more than that to get some attention.
Separate names with a comma.
