64 65 Both look nice!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't think anything really suggests details from the pictures (and I wouldn't personally call it details). It's just something I thought was a...
I'm also in the F12 camp and guessing the holder used to say either F15 or fine details
63 (I'd actually go 63+ but that is not an option) ....there is definitely too much chatter in my opinion for a 65, but I would not be surprised...
I voted F15 ...maybe even a net grade
67...clean cheek/fields, no major distractions...still not quite 68
This one surprised me. Great job on acquiring for half off the Legend sale!
AU 55 I see wear and it's not quite the look of an AU 58; nonetheless, it has great eye appeal.
Nice! I once thought about putting together a subset of classic commemoratives with ships, but didn't complete it. The Hudson was one that eluded me.
@Paddy54 you're up... Points table: ddddd - 39.26 Points Beefer518 - 31.26 Points baseball21 - 26.61 Points heavycam.monstervam - 23.51 Points...
@philjam and there is your answer on how this particular coin was sold.
I believe he said the 64 pl looked worse than the coin he had (the 64 that became a 66 pl). I’m guessing the coin had a combo of luster breaks...
Here were the threads...I guesses 65 PL on it originally https://www.cointalk.com/threads/gtg-80-s-1.331750/...
Well you started by saying there is no proof. So we have found some proof. I agree it’s more prominent on rainbow toned coins, but it happens on...
I’ll see if I can dig some up; I’ve certainly heard of it happening and @CircCam just posted one of those that I recall. As for me, I’ve not...
That's hardly proof as it's not even it's own thread and at best a few people are looking into it (and even less are sharing their results)....
@cladking is the person you are seeking. And I don't think he'll love you calling them "crap coins" :p Also, some of these dates are very...
eBay, various auction houses (like Great Collections/Heritage/Stacks/Legend/etc),the forum for sale section, coin shows....it all depends on what...
Yep...I believe you were closest to 64 at 63+ and the rest of us all said 63. I’ll update the standings later on.
Separate names with a comma.
