How about this one that was recently in the toning premium thread? [IMG] [IMG]
Yes I noticed that too. They must have felt that no reply would be satisfactory. Although, if someone replied with an apology and a promise to fix...
I noticed it and also wonder what it is. Your explanation seems plausible. Regardless of what it is, I think it is distracting on a high grade coin.
66....I thought 67 was a possibility but it appears to have a few distractions that could knock it down to 66
55...I see wear; I could see it being a 58, but the hit under the eye and some other hits in the cheek area appear to prevent a 58 (at least to me)
64...luster looks good, but there are enough marks to prevent a gem grade
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1033258/anyone-ever-have-a-coin-bounced-while-in-for-reholdering/p1 Anyone see/follow this thread on the...
This last one I thought was a toss-up but leaned towards no star (due to the terminal toning around the rims). I still liked the look and was...
Summary: Rd. 1: 1955-S MS 64 1c (NO Star) --> Should it star? -->Yes: 2 vs No: 11 Rd. 2: 1885-O MS 65 $1 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs...
@thomas mozzillo is on a roll and was within a few dollars of the $352.12 price for this one. Points table: ddddd - 46.26 Points Beefer518 -...
Let's extend this one too...
I'll extend this at least another day.
Separate names with a comma.
