I'll say NO sticker (looks close for grade...fbl seems shaky-although ok by PCGS standards)
Nice to see you posting again @Beefer518 :) Great looking set!
older holder... MS 65
Floor is open...
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC...
MS 63
"W" and "T" were short lived designations given by NGC for White (untoned) and Toned coins. As NGC wrote: "The reason for ending its use is simply...
That's a nice set! I like the idea of building a proof year set with all NGC star coins. I once did a similar project for 1961 but with all cameo...
I'm not aware of any info released on how many coins received the designation. The "W" designation lasted around 2.5 years from 1999-2002. A war...
MS 62
Nice! Definitely not something you see every day.
MS 64
PF 67 ...possibly with a star for obverse cameo. 1956 is one of the dates in the Franklin series that comes with strong cameo....based on the...
I like it, but the obverse fields concern me (not sure if it is something from the photo). My feeling is NO Sticker.
You can go next.
@Publius2 giving us a clue about this one prompting "lively chatter" was what told me it did sticker (I believe I would have still guessed that...
My guess was 66 before the reveal. PCGS (and NGC) won't put the RPM unless one pays the extra fee for it.
It can be difficult as many dealers have their own pricing. I've seen dealers offer very close to greysheet and others are quite a bit lower. It...
*Note: I'll update summary info after the dime posted by @Publius2 My thinking is that the dime is original, solid for the grade, and JA liked...
Separate names with a comma.
