3.5 ...I like it and think both sides are cool (although I do prefer the reverse)
@kSigSteve what is the grade?
@kSigSteve you are up...followed by @Lehigh96
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
I hadn't head of that one. It looks like it was an East Coast show and one of the longest running shows of all time.
Please read @Insider 's comments and you will see there are ways. https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1028524/now-this-coin-is-confusing-me
Some people like to collect them or have a personal reason.
How about the case of readable date but not mint mark (like the 1889 example)?
It does open up some possibilities for fakes. And that would be a bigger worry if these catch on and start seeing large premiums. However, if the...
I should have read my original thread again :banghead: ICG will do this in some cases:...
Another reason that I found this interesting is that I own the coin below. When I posted it, the best guess on here was that PCGS didn't grade it...
Does any other company do the same? I'm fairly certain NGC does not and I know PCGS won't. @Insider would ICG grade a coin without knowing what...
Separate names with a comma.
