Do they give star designations for the AU58 grade?
My initial reaction was MS64, but both services love these coins with deep toning, MS65 wouldn't surprise me.
I think the toning is natural and I agree that I think you should have it graded by NGC. It probably isn't going to get a premium gem grade, but...
What I remember is that the debates on the TCCS forum were epic!
You can't type "funny story" and then proceed to post a rant in order to call it humorous or comical. That seller ticked you off, you ranted to...
Lol, yeah, I was trying to hide in plain sight.
My initial reaction to the photos was MS64, but I really like the color and associated eye appeal so I bumped it to MS65.
As far as I know, the seller doesn't get to choose the reason for blocking a potential E-Bay bidder/buyer. The seller simply adds the name to the...
It would grade, but get that idea out of your head right now. Your coin simply doesn't have the value to be considered a worthwhile submission....
[IMG]
I think the strike and luster are too weak for MS66; my guess is MS65. I do love the color.
Ya know, there is a mark on the neck on the slab shot that doesn't really show up on your closeup photos. That might be the reason for the MS63...
Agree 100%. The spot bothers me more than the fingerprint, it is just in such a bad place.
Bought a small collection of raw Jefferson recently and am going to keep this 1965 SMS for myself. [IMG]
Ok which slab photo is better? Left or Right? Please vote in the attached poll, thanks! [IMG] As always, comments welcome.
Bravo Tom, this thread is TOTW, for all you Cointalkers who have been around for a while.
That is ridiculous! They punched the wrong date on that coin. It is supposed to be a 58-D!
A blue wing and a lavender wing, dripping with luster. Way too cool!
OMG WOW! Holy Cow! I think the 1940 is the cream of the crop! That said, they are all fantastic.
I agree, MS65
Separate names with a comma.
