It's a forgery, it has a type-1 reverse, which wasn't used after 1876. (see the oval berry under the eagle's foot, above the first 0 of 900?)
In the words of the giant bug in "MEN IN BLACK," 'I accept your challenge!' elapsed time, 10sec. from going to the trade dollar listings on...
Fakes abound, this one looks fairly typical. Here is a link to a genuine on on Heritage, I chose it because it is au details and has been...
4 generations, huh? Amazing longevity amongst them, considering this thing was made last month in all likelihood .
Purchased raw, on a whim, for type. I welcome grade opinions, conventional and EAC, and attributions (flip says S-241) Thanks in advance, my...
Chocaholic Numismatists unite!
I do hope the o.p. takes this coin to a numisnatist and has it examined properly. the 2-d images just don't reveal much, I see an S where Toad...
Thanks, so do I. I thought when I bought it, it must have been cleaned/whizzed, but I have examined it carefully and can't find any signs of...
Since "1795" was brought up, I will offer, as a sacrificial lamb, knowing that I will be blown out of the water, nay, vaporized, by some of the...
Just a great '99 dollar, 900 fine! I find much to admire, and nothing to criticize... nice eye you have, that would be a standout coin in any...
Well, I think it's AU! notice the detail and the patina-- I can tell it's never been cleaned. i wonder if it's the scarce folding variety?...
These coins were workhorses of commerce and worth a lot in terms of goods in their day (look at some of Walker Evans' photos of the Bowery in the...
That 42-s would fit very nicely into a set of circulated Walkers I could envision!
Separate names with a comma.
