Their feedback is terrible by E-Bay standards and your ignorance of that fact is embarrassing.
Look up the word "insinuate" because you definitely did that.
Don't take this the wrong way, but I would wait until you finish college before starting your type collection again. You obviously have a keen...
Your story about the dealer taking back the AU coin confused me, I thought you bought this coin from the same dealer at the same time. Shouldn't...
It is always good to see another toning enthusiast in the house, welcome. As you admit that you are new to the toning scene, you should do...
Do you really think that the toning on this coin is impressive enough to boost the grade? Toning by itself does not generate eye appeal, it must...
And it is in an older holder so we can't even blame loosening TPG standards.;) I'm sure you are aware that both TPG's allow for roll friction on...
MS63FH
coruscating luster shimmers beneath variegated shades of chestnut and army green = avert your eyes as this is the coin equivalent of medusa
MS63FB, the luster is no where near what a common date war time Mercury dime typically shows, and the toning is a rather strange pattern. It is...
wonderful secondary patina = dipped & retoned
scattered abrasions = bag marked to hell
Wholly original toning = ugly as hell
And I got a bah humbug for you too! [IMG]
I'm punishing all you guys who voted for the Presidential Dollars, they rule!!!! [IMG]
I can't tell if it is FT from those photos or not but I'm guessing it is not. The surfaces look really clean, MS67 quality, but the final grade...
He also freely admits that he doesn't know much about Morgan Dollars.
That coin looks bu to me but short of gem grade. There are some minor ticks and it doesn't have anywhere near the luster need for MS65 or better....
Still trying to figure out how that resides in an MS65 holder
I really don't see much wear but it does have signs of circulation, I'm going with AU58. Unfortunately it would need to be gem grade to have any...
Separate names with a comma.
