Because my ghetto photography setup doesn't allow for it. :p I'm calibrated for copper! :D Your 43 looks pretty much like the luster I'm seeing...
NGC is inconsistent between 66 and 67. PCGS does a better job at these grade levels IMO.
The 43 has booming luster!
Any comments on the 43?
64RB, looks low on luster, 65 in terms of hits IMO.
1977 pseudowood
I agree, solid 66!
WOW! Nice grade!
Just a little wear but the corrosion is killing it. I'm surprized they slabbed it with the verdigris.
I think I'll be within the old plus/minus one. LOL
It does have strong, MS like luster.
Here's another one I found....lots of luster on this gold toned Jeff.
1974 - Another tough coin to find without hits, black spots, strike issues, etc. I found this one in an OBW....and I opened a crapton of them to...
They were sure busy polishing those dies in Denver!
Killer luster...works with all the TPG's, 67FB.
I hate when they do that! No love for the woody. There's like almost no hits on that coin....BadThadGS MS-65BN! :D
Dang...the obverse fields got me, it's definately a very nice coin, I was on the fence with that luster.
To the right collector it could add a $1 or 2 to the value. It's a pretty nice coin and it's interesting with the filled die error.
1973....angled shots show the quality best.
1973
Separate names with a comma.