That coin absolutely rocks! Bravo!
Nice Luster!
1945-P [IMG] 1945-D: Top Pop [IMG] 1945-S: Appalachian [IMG]
$120
1944-S [IMG]
EF huh? 40 or 45? The devil is in the details!
That’s what I do, call bluffs. You bluffed, I called, you mucked. Btw, when I said many of the other posts were hogwash, I was specifically...
Perhaps you didn’t read the rest of this thread, I clearly challenged Doug’s opinion on this subject. I’m not in the habit of challenging people...
Only if you equate disagreeing with you and exposing your inexperience as against the rules.
Not a chance, I will finish when the inexperienced collectors in this world stop attempting to lecture the knowledgeable numismatists about things...
I don't know, is calling very experienced numismatists gullible, repeatedly, a personal attack? (see below) If you can't take it, don't dish it...
So what would you say to the person who purchased a $10K rare coin 20 years ago, and due to gradeflation and rising populations, his once rare...
Unlike everyone else, I don't think the luster or the surfaces are worthy of a gem grade, I say MS63 BN
1944-D [img]
This entire post is hot garbage!
In the spirit of this thread, that is hogwash. You deliver your opinions on this and every other subject with a dogmatic narcissism that the...
Umm, you seriously need to take that 1944-P out of your Dansco and have it graded. It looks like a no brainer MS67 with a very real chance at FS...
What happened to 1944-P, 1944-D, 1944-S, and 1945-P? I thought this thread was posting nickels in order by date.
I'm not disputing the grade, but no way am I paying $3K+ for a coin with an obvious eye appeal problem.
I would be concerned that it would come back details for environmental damage.
Separate names with a comma.
