Also if anyone wants to discuss, what do you think is "better" in terms of details grades? Cleaned or Artificial Toning?
You all know the drill by now (see if I was crazy, wise, or somewhere in between). :p Having concluded the NGC portion, I move along to the PCGS....
Reveal.... another disappointment :( ....PCGS called it UNC Details Cleaned and NGC called it Unc Details Artificial Toning ....I didn't see any...
Glad to see you back! We missed you in the meantime. Nice photos as usual!
Last call...
I think the TPGs did as well :banghead:
I've seen it mentioned too but don't have anything to share besides what you wrote. Maybe someone will know or we will just have to wait until...
@Morgandude11
Here is the second of my NGC show grading coins from the ANA. Some might remember this one too (another of my interesting experiences :p). I am...
I'm guessing MS 65 ...fields and cheek look clean; coin is lustrous
The honor of being correct might be the prize. :p
MS 66 ...nice looking Buffalo!
Yep! There were at least three "correct" answers and my opinion of 63 star (would have been ok with a 58 star too).
And the grade is MS 62 (no star). This coin has been on an interesting journey. It started as a raw eBay find; then went to Anacs (one of my early...
It makes you wonder how many times it had traded hands since being slabbed without the error being noticed?
It always is with guess the grades. :p
Looks to be a blazer! I will concur with the MS 66 crowd.
Last call before the reveal later today.
That is certainly interesting. It could be one of the earliest mechanical errors. I'm not a big fan of the bug but I agree that it could have...
I like the way that set looks from what I see so far!
Separate names with a comma.
