AT
Agreed, the rules for the star designation preclude any coin with toning approaching terminal. The entire obverse of that coin is terminally...
I'm not sure if it is AT but it is ugly as sin. I say NT/MA.
He is a member on the NGC forum also, but nobody over there could be considered "active" at this point.
It’s impossible to judge the luster or even see luster breaks in those photos. I will say MS64.
I’m saying no on both Morgans. They are so common with fantastic bright rainbow toning that these two are stretch. The first doesn’t cover...
Wait, who took that photo? Did you get a new camera? Awesome coin btw!
Ok, here is a rainbow toned full step premium gem Jefferson Nickel for consideration. [img]
I saw them as well and think they would definitely preclude a 6FS designation from NGC, but I think the coin is solid for NGC 5FS or PCGS FS...
Thats one of the nicest obverse toned Rosies I have ever seen, beautiful!
Wow, you just found a choice BU full step 1950-D while roll hunting. Congrats!
The easiest way is to look for wear in the fields. If you see what looks like high point wear on the devices but full luster in the fields, it is...
The 1954-S is the worst struck of the entire Jefferson series. Your coin has a very good strike and is an excellent album coin. To give everyone...
I will say NT/MA on the WLH. The photo leaves much to be desired and I'm not sure it accurately portrays the actual appearance of the coin. It...
No star
MS65 PL
MS63 BN ANACS Old holder
+1 MS64 based on perceived lack of luster.
That’s how I felt about the Lincoln Cent and I don’t even own it.
No star on the bust half
Separate names with a comma.
