MS 66….not full steps (steps under 3rd column are fused together) …and I’m thinking ICG slab
Thanks! I will likely do a thread to detail my progress so far. I am trying to stick to a reasonable budget but it still adds up. It's also funny...
It might upgrade in grade but losing the DMPL is definitely a possibility with the more stringent standards. It would also have to go MS 64 PL to...
Apmex tends to photoshop coins into slab photos. This one isn't as bad as some I've seen but the proportions look off. The Buffalo Nickel looks...
The people that answer the questions on the phone aren't professional graders and you're lucky if they even know a little bit about coins. You...
There is a small premium for these types of mistakes. You can send it back to fix but that might be more work than it’s worth (PCGS customer...
I'm fairly sure this is from one of the eBay sellers that juices every photo (including making non PL coins look DMPL).
MS 65
The photos certainly weren't ideal to show the dmpl surfaces-they were better for trying to come up with a numerical grade.
The reveal: AU 58 DMPL ....the photos aren't optimal to show the deep mirrors but they are there. Standards might have been looser for dmpl back...
I'm pretty sure that is just a function of the light bouncing off the mirrored surfaces.
Au details cleaned
AU; maybe even a slider ...can't tell from the photo, but I'm potentially seeing evidence of a cleaning
Some nice additions!
I don't tend to look at VAMs so that is not the answer for what excited me.
I didn't really notice any obvious doubling. Maybe just the photo?
Please guess the grade. And guess why I'm extra excited by this coin. :D The first photo is from the seller and the next is my attempt to show...
I like the squirrel. Nice set!
The photos of yours are nice. NGC photos in general have been fairly solid from what I have observed others say lately.
Nice set! I'm glad to have been responsible for a few. :)
Separate names with a comma.
