Based on the Heritage results and greysheet numbers that @Dima quoted above, the price seems fair (assuming the coin has at least average eye...
That is for the slab and my grade is a 64...seems a little too mushy to be gem
MS 65
Here was a story on Coin World in July 2023: https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-coins/ngc-to-introduce-a-new-slab-hologram-and-qr-code I have...
MS 67 on the slab and MS 66 would be my grade. ...that particular toning isn't really emblematic of any one type; I could even see the NTC holder...
1819...VF 20 ...not sure if the streak is enough to go details environmental damage, a lower net grade, or is acceptable and is actually higher...
MS 65 RB ...NNC holder?
MS 66 ....looks clean enough for the grade. As far as toning, I would guess album. It does not have the pattern associated with end roll toning...
Those are solid photos especially after not taking any for several years. Keep up the good work!
Best of luck; we look forward to the results! By the way, this makes me want to do an ICG sub as well (one day I will find some raw coins worth...
My Dansco has just the one spot (as mentioned by @mrweaseluv ) so I just have the one coin. The 1921 has become more expensive ever since the...
MS 63
61 is a little surprising but it was a toss-up between 61 and 62...looks like NGC was a bit stricter than usual
The prices being listed is helpful but I can also understand why not having them on some coins makes sense (like gold or others that fluctuate...
MS 62....can even see a 61 because of the cheek but I think it just made it as a 62
MS 62
[ATTACH]
I'm still at MS 64 with the new photos
MS 64 ...it might be the photo style but I don't see it having strong enough luster to warrant a gem grade
I have a few examples to share (and could come up with more if I tried but won't at this time :p). First is this Morgan that I know I won't...
Separate names with a comma.
