Looks like die polish lines
Just checked this coin:...
Depending on luster I think it has a good shot at 64.
Right right. And the sun glare from you beach chair in Aruba probably didnt help either:hilarious::cool:
Another newp: 1953 proof British Shilling. Cameo on obverse [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I love big coins and this one is a beast weighing in at 56.7 grams, 41mm in diamter, and 5mm thick. A one year issue 1797 British 2 pence:...
64+
I just want to point out that the PCGS true view really exaggerates the reverse colors. They arent that bright and if turned in the right light...
Right? I would have paid like 100 bucks for it, which is still pretty high. PCGS doesnt even have a price for this coin in RB let alone without a...
Ever see a coin that you fall in love with, one that should be in your price range? I expected some sort of a premium for this and honestly...
Yeah that is what i was thinking after comparing photos. I will give another soak tomorrow.
Alright. Looks to be a little bit still under the eye, but i think this looks much better than what it was. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] A little splotchy...
VF35
Id say 65+. The old holder probably says 64 though
Well it is done. Brought the coin to my shop this morning to break it out in the vice and then use the acetone. No traces of glue seem to be...
This is a small date: [ATTACH] courtesy coinfacts
It is the large date. The small date has a much shorter leg(?) on the 6.
Oops im a dummy:eggface:
The "extra metal" you are seeing is a plating bubble. Nothing more than damage. Take a toothpick and you can actually push on the plating and move...
I think the glue will bother me more than the spotted surfaces. I will break it open today and see if i can remove the glue.
Separate names with a comma.
