When you compare the last two Jefferson Nickels posted in this thread, its absurd that the war nickel got a higher rating than my 41-D. That coin...
I agree that toning doesn't get much better than this on a nickel, and for that reason, I give it a MONSTER 6 rating.
It is @ddddd thread so you gotta wait for him to chime in. I am sure he will be along later on today, and he hasn't yet given his opinion of my...
That Truview makes it look tremendous. MS65
Full Bell Lines are not like Full Steps or Full Bands, they are allowed to have marks that interrupt the lines as long as the continuity of the...
Please tell me that 69-S is a proof. That coin has full steps, and I don't think the 69-S exists with full steps.
I think the color pushes this to MS65 FBL
[img]
I have one to post.
Solid 5
MS62
Nope, I saw it in the plastic govt issued set. Maybe @Springford CC will post his photo of it in the plastic. Regarding the toning, he liked it...
It isn't my coin, it is my brother's, @Springford CC. He pulled it from a mint set and submitted it because he liked the toning and 1962 FHD's...
Please GTG of this 1962 Franklin Half Dollar shown below. I have attached a poll for you to cast your vote and you may select up to 3 different...
I could understand this coming back in an MS66+ holder, but MS66, I don't think so. I sent it to PCGS because I had other coins going there....
It's official, it came back PCGS DDO FS-101 MS65. [IMG]
Especially photos taken at an extreme angle like the ones shown.
Ain’t that the truth, worse than capturing full steps on Jefferson Nickels
MS66+ 5FS Very close to MS67, the steps are a guess based on those photos but they look pretty good. Nice war nickel.
1881-S: 6 1887: 5
Separate names with a comma.
