So the choice is [IMG] or...... Oh wait, I don’t own any untoned MS65 FBLs Someone wanna help me out?
Gradeflation is not the result of the TPGs making deliberate changes to their numerical grading standards. Typically it is the result of the...
The area to the left of the crack is not wear, that is the incomplete strike that typically precludes the FBL designation. In this case, I think...
5.7, just misses monster. The cornucopia pattern is a tad distracting.
I’m not sure why you are choosing between MS60 and MS63. MS60 is an extremely rare grade. It indicates a coin that while shows no evidence of...
The problem being discussed here is specific to the AU58 grade. All the lower AU grades have enough loss of detail and luster that the...
4.5 That toning is outstanding for a Lincoln.
Define the term “wear”
I went with MS66, the luster shown in those photos just doesn’t look good enough for 67 or better.
The lines in the obverse fields are die polish lines and don’t have any effect on grade.
An Iowa is a commemorative half dollar, though I’m not sure why he chose that one to make his point. His broader point is that Saints suffer from...
Start this thread out on a good note, and a premium gem Elgin that was solid for the grade. [img] People love to post coins that they think...
This was one of my favorites: [IMG]
5.5 Has monster toning but needs cleaner surfaces.
This coin is very close to FBL, but PCGS might not because they could say that the marks break the continuity of the lines. I have seen much...
I’m at 2.75 The surfaces of this quarter are outstanding and the toning helps with the eye appeal by providing an almost cameo appearance to the...
MS64 FB, tough to see this getting a gem grade with those disturbances in the obverse fields.
No, grading standards aren’t fluid, the “crackout game” is proof that subjectivity is inherent in the grading process.
Well, I’m a professional gambler by trade, so that kinda stuff doesn’t really bother me.
I like it, pretty golden toned beauty.
Separate names with a comma.
