I nailed this one, and the grade came back higher than I had expected, which was MS64-65. [IMG] [IMG]
[IMG] [IMG]
I have no idea how to grade these, other than to say even whenever they look MS to my eyes they end up being AU, so my grade is AU58.
Yeah, I got robbed, hosed, screwed, however you wanna put it. I was expecting MS67 5FS, instead I got something I can't even put in my registry...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
MS67
This mirrors my initial impression, but I actually think it got the MS62.
These coins are all duplicates from my #1 Ranked NGC Registry Set of Greenland Milled coinage. Paypal G&S Only Sorry, no international shipments....
Not bad for pocket change huh? [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
It is too dark for 67+, they like incredible luster in combination with vibrant toning for the + designation.
It doesn't matter, NGC likes crusty toners and they don't penalize coins for having advanced peripheral toning due to album storage. Eg: [IMG]...
Not sure what you guys are seeing that is responsible for these really low grades, but I see a crusty toner with near flawless surfaces. MS67
As someone who has actually attempted to assemble a set of rainbow toned Peace Dollars, I can attest to how difficult it is to find coins like...
MS66 Altered Surfaces, thumbing
[img]
+1 I agree with everything in this post, but by no means does this exhaust all the reasons I would rather use the BIN or BO listing method than...
The majority of people who have e-Bay stores use the BIN listing format, it is nothing more than a virtual coin shop. Do you walk into a B&M coin...
None of those coins are even close to being submission worthy. Regarding the Jefferson Nickels, the 1974-D & 1964-D are MS63, and the 1989-D is...
+1 Skip you beat me to it, just astounding how much misinformation he packed into a few paragraphs.
Separate names with a comma.
