My car doesn't sing
Pretty clean coin. Since the toning breaks aren't physical nicks I'll go with a green bean.
I totally agree to leave it as is!
The pictures looked good after I found my pair of glasses; full of scotch.
Maybe one should start a glow in the dark toning thread.
Obviously, some mint employee was having fun with this. Since these sets are put together by hand it's hard to believe it was an accident. Too...
Go ahead, rub it in!
Ibid! The reverse is a solid 5 but nothing on the obverse. One really can't "net" toners so I'd give it a 4.
I agree with the 3. If it were more lustrous or rainbow I'd go higher.
I'm glad I'm late to this thread. I saw the nicks and scratches and would have gone MS62 but not details-damaged. I should start a thread called...
I agree that I would give it a high end 4.
I agree that I don't see any hint of Cameo in the OP coin from his pictures. Compare that to the graded example I showed. The reverse shows...
Thanks, please do! I hope you are right and they turn out to be nice coins. If so, it should give you some confidence in future dealings with...
I assume you are talking about the coin!
The pictures don't tell me enough about it. Here's a proof 1883 I just purchased to compare it with. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
If I could buy it for XF money then I'd take a chance on it. The poor imagery may hide a scratch or some other mark. I wouldn't pay the price of...
For some reason I wasn't getting any new email updates from this thread. No respect, no respect at all! I would have given the 1939-D a 5, but I...
The rub on the high points of the eagle wings and beak would tell me it's a high end AU coin.
Well I'm sure if two similar graded 1828 quarters were put side by side, this one and one with a bean I'd like the OP coin better. I buy coins...
My dad offered to sell me in 1972 for $65 and had no takers. 48 years later I'm still ugly with no takers.
Separate names with a comma.
